Patient's satisfaction of their life after the procedure was evaluated on a scale from 0 to 10. A telephone follow-up questionnaire was conducted for all patients. Data included demographics, perioperative course, and outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data of all patients who underwent laparoscopic placement of a gastric stimulator between 20 was retrospectively reviewed. Further studies are required to confirm these results.Ībstract = "AIM: To evaluate the safety and outcomes of laparoscopic placement of a gastric stimulator for patients with gastroparesis. ![]() This procedure is relatively safe for patients with refractory gastroparesis. CONCLUSIONS: Gastric electrical stimulator may improve gastrointestinal symptoms, reduce the use of drug therapy, and offer subsequent improvement in patients' general life satisfaction. Three patients indicated an improvement in their general life satisfaction. Four patients indicated that they were tolerating regular diet. All patients indicated reduction of symptoms, 4 patients decreased or discontinued their drug therapy. Only 5 patients were available for a telephone interview. There were no postoperative complications or mortality. There were no conversions, no perioperative complications all patients were discharged on the first postoperative day. RESULTS: Seven patients underwent the procedure. Accessed on November 30, 2015.AIM: To evaluate the safety and outcomes of laparoscopic placement of a gastric stimulator for patients with gastroparesis. "The gut-brain axis: A major glucoregulatory player". "Gastric electrical stimulation for obesity". "Recent Trends in Endoscopic Bariatric Therapies". Autonomic Neuroscience: Basic & Clinical. ![]() "Systematic review and meta-analysis: Gastric electrical stimulation for gastroparesis".
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |